An ultra can be the dream. The customer may be entering a much shorter race. A fast-growing Bali event and the choices of Salomon, HOKA and Nike ACG reveal the business around that ambition.
N
Neverlater
23 October 2026
In this article
Why would someone choose to run 100 kilometres?
Go deeper
What does this mean for your business?
Discuss this article privately with Neverlater. Its title and link stay attached, so you can start with the question that matters to you.
From a sofa, the question sounds reasonable. Inside a running community, it can sound different. A friend finishes a race you once thought impossible. The group chat lights up. A weekend run becomes a habit. What used to look excessive starts looking like a plan.
For brands, the interesting part is this: the purchase starts with an ambition. Shoes, food, watches, race entries and travel mean more when they serve a goal. The finish is personal. Getting there connects the runner to a much larger economy.
The surprise is how wide that economy can stretch. At one growing Indonesian event with “Ultra” in its name, most registered entrants chose shorter distances. For brands, the useful question is what those customers need now, wherever their ambitions eventually take them.
1. The Ultra Name, the Shorter-Distance Crowd
Trail describes the terrain; ultra describes a distance beyond the marathon. An ultra can happen on roads. A trail race can be short. An event name tells you less about its customers than its entry list does.
BCA BTR Ultra’s organiser reported 4,007 registered entrants for May 2025 in Kintamani, Bali, up 118% against 1,836 participants reported for 2024. The course menu changed: 55K became 60K and 85K became 100K.
The revealing number is the mix: 3,487 entrants, or 87%, registered for 7K, 15K or 30K, including the children’s category. The 60K and 100K fields together accounted for 520.
For a like-for-like look at road and trail, OIA’s 2026 Running Report puts US road participation at 52.3 million people in 2025 and trail at 17.2 million. Trail grew 6.6% that year. Road’s audience was roughly three times larger; people can participate in both.
Broad reach. Recent growth is concentrated among less-frequent runners.
Trail Running
US, 2025
17.2m activity participants, +6.6% year on year; OIA
A smaller, growing audience; both casual and core participation increased.
Ultramarathons
North America, 2025
102,815 unique runners in the results database, +2.6% versus 2024; UltraRunning Magazine
A defined racing niche. Database coverage is not a population census.
HYROX
Global, 2025/26 season
Over 1.4m participants across 100+ events; Infront
Large operator-reported scale in a branded fitness-racing format; unique-person methodology is not disclosed.
Read the rows as context, not a market-share league table. Activities overlap, and the geographies, periods and counting methods differ. HYROX combines eight 1K runs with eight functional exercise stations. Its scale belongs to a branded fitness-racing format, not the trail-running market.
The picture: a growing US trail audience, an established North American ultra niche and a visible Indonesian trail community. This cannot rank Indonesia’s fastest-growing sport. Choose the runners your business will serve.
3. When the Bib Becomes Part of the Bio
For some runners, the attraction is the challenge: could I become capable of doing this?
Runners climb towards Grand Col Ferret above Italy’s Val Ferret during UTMB, 2 September 2023. Photo: Anthospace, CC BY-SA 4.0.
Our reading: an ultra can turn curiosity into a project. Preparation gets more deliberate; ordinary purchases become part of the plan. The outcome is still uncertain enough to matter.
Then the bib becomes part of the bio. Worn shoes or a finisher’s shirt can carry effort, shared memories and the satisfaction of following through. That meaning cannot be manufactured at checkout.
Brands become part of that memory through fit, durability, reliability and support when plans change. A running relationship needs room for rest and unfinished races too.
4. The Start Line Is A Group Project
Behind one runner’s finish-line photo: friends sharing transport, checkpoint volunteers and a family making room for preparation.
You can see a local sign of this, too. In its April 2025 release discussing the 2024 Year in Sport report, Strava said Indonesian running-club participation had risen 83%. This is a platform measure, not the number of clubs, unique Indonesian runners or ultrarunners.
Runners pause at the Bonatti refuge in Italy during UTMB, 28 August 2021. The photographer describes a water point here, rather than a timing checkpoint. Photo: Anthospace, CC BY-SA 4.0.
The group has answers to new questions: how the vest fits, what the destination is like, who is entering which distance. Shared advice makes a race weekend less unfamiliar, though it cannot replace individual readiness.
Someone still has to make the day work safely. The BTR Ultra 2025 runner guide describes medical posts, radio communication and emergency procedures, alongside routes from 7K to 100K. That welcoming atmosphere takes work, even when it never makes the finish-line photo.
A useful brand contribution could be a well-run fitting session, dependable aid-station supplies or properly supported volunteers. The test is whether it helps when nobody is posing for a picture.
5. More Than A Finish Line
Sometimes the best part of finishing is finding the friends who waited for you. Sometimes it is quietly realising you can do something that once felt out of reach.
That is one way to understand the appeal: personal progress, a shared memory and a reason to come back. The distance matters to the person running it. It does not have to impress everyone else.
A 2021 voluntary survey of 130 Indonesian non-elite runners found health orientation and personal goal achievement scored highest, while recognition and competition scored lowest. Its respondents had 10K, half-marathon or marathon experience; it was not an ultra-specific or nationally representative sample.
A medal or a well-worn pair of shoes can hold the memory of training, early alarms and people who helped along the way. That is our interpretation of what makes these objects meaningful, rather than evidence that every runner wants the same thing.
Brands can celebrate the first short trail, the friend who showed up and the runner who knew when to stop. Useful kit and a welcoming community belong in that story, too.
Money, time, location and family responsibilities still shape who can participate. A long race is not a test of anyone’s moral worth.
6. Follow the Spend, Then Check the Margin
More runners do not automatically fill another start line or fund another shoe brand. Stock, logistics, support and customer acquisition still need paying for. The race photo will not do the accounting.
A race can lengthen the shopping list. Shoes get repeated use, food and drink need replenishing, and a watch may last years. Destination events add transport, accommodation and meals: different buying occasions for different businesses.
Several Spending Pools, Several Businesses
Spending pool
Typical purchase
Who earns revenue
Footwear and clothing
Shoes, socks and running kit
Brands and retailers
Nutrition
Food, gels and drinks for training or racing
Food brands and retailers
Equipment
Packs, poles, lights and watches; often used across activities
Equipment brands and retailers
Race entry
A place in a particular event
Event organisers
Race-linked travel
Transport, accommodation and meals
Transport, lodging and food businesses
This is a spending map, not a market-size calculation. A runner may buy from several rows; durable equipment is not purchased again for every race. Count realised purchases once, within a defined period and geography.
How Big Is The Opportunity?
Start with the shoes. These three global footwear estimates for 2025 put scale behind the race photos; they do not cover everything a runner buys.
Global category
2025 market estimate
What it measures
Trail-running shoes
US$8.9 billion
Grand View Research’s light, rugged and off-trail shoe categories. Footwear only.
Running shoes
US$44.5 billion
Global Market Insights’ running-shoes segment. Its report lists outdoor and trail footwear separately.
Athletic footwear overall
US$130.1 billion
Global Market Insights’ broader total, covering performance and sports-oriented footwear, including active-lifestyle use.
Sources: Grand View Research, trail-running shoes and Global Market Insights, athletic footwear, checked 18 October 2026. Global revenue estimates in US dollars, 2025. These are publishers’ estimates, not audited industry totals. Definitions and methods differ. Do not add the rows or use them to calculate trail’s share of running. The broader athletic total already contains multiple footwear categories.
Trail shoes sit inside a much larger sports-footwear economy. A sale does not reveal whether the buyer ran an ultra, hiked or wore them around town. Entries, clothing, nutrition and travel are outside these estimates.
For Indonesia, a dependable all-in trail-running revenue total remains unverified. The US road-versus-trail participation comparison earlier in this article helps size an audience; Bali’s race mix helps identify an entry point. Neither can be converted into Indonesian spending without purchase evidence.
For a local brand, “What if we win 1% of a global market?” skips the useful questions. Which runners can we reach, what will they buy, and what margin remains? The event model below tests one small opportunity.
Support Notes: What The Spending Figures Tell Us
Brooks offers a narrower commercial signal. In Q2 2026, it reported 71% year-on-year growth in its trail styles, with Cascadia up 58%. The release gives no absolute trail revenue or explicit value-versus-volume basis for that growth. It shows momentum at one brand. It cannot put a price on Indonesia’s whole opportunity.
There is time to help before race day. In RunSignup’s 2025 US ultra sample, 44.2% of registrations occurred more than 120 days before the event. A brand can get involved early, although this tells us nothing about how much a runner spends.
For a local price check, BTS100’s 2026 standard domestic entry fees run from Rp800,000 for 8K and Rp1 million for 18K to Rp1.6 million for 70K. These are published fees, not realised entry revenue; early-bird rates differ.
Someone reusing equipment and staying near home presents a different opportunity from a customer booking a destination trip.
The kit also spans price points. Decathlon Indonesia’s published listings, checked on 17 October 2026, show adult Kipcore Gravel road-and-trail shoes at Rp1.2 million–Rp1.3 million and men’s Kipsummit trail shoes at Rp1.699 million.
These are asking prices, not a complete kit budget or evidence of retailer profit. Availability and checkout prices still need checking.
For BCA, a race weekend creates occasions to use the bank’s payments products. Its 14–17 May 2026 BTR promotion offered Rp50,000 off merchandise purchases of at least Rp400,000, limited to 75 transactions a day using eligible BCA payment methods.
A separate gift offer rewarded activities including qualifying myBCA QRIS purchases at event tenants. The terms disclose no redemption totals or incremental revenue.
Source: UltraRunning Magazine, accessed 16 October 2026. These are recorded finishes, not unique people. Coverage can change; this is not a matched-race panel.
Organisers face another catch: a growing crowd can be spread across more races. In the North American database above, 2025 finishes rose 3.7%, while distance/format races rose 8.6%. Average finishers per race fell from 48.71 to 46.54. One event can contain several races, and database coverage can change. Even so, the recorded average field got smaller.
7. Three Brands, Three Different Bets
How are brands approaching those customers? Salomon, HOKA and Nike ACG disclose different investments and some results. Trail-specific sales and sponsorship profit remain undisclosed.
Different routes to the customer. Sources and the limits of each case are linked below.
Salomon: Build The Stage, Then The Kit
Salomon is helping make trail running watchable. Its April 2025 agreement with Warner Bros. Discovery covers Golden Trail production, distribution and promotion. The short-distance series uses roughly two-hour races and spectator-friendly loops: a different media proposition from following a runner through an entire ultra.
The series reported nearly 18 million views on WBD platforms in 2025, with six events shown live and more than 67 hours of linear and on-demand coverage. The published result is a view count. Unique viewers, customer conversion and sales return are not disclosed.
The athlete relationship also becomes merchandise. Courtney Dauwalter’s 2026 collection spans S/LAB Ultra Glide 2 shoes, Shortney shorts and a S/LAB Sense 6 hydration vest. It connects one recognisable running identity to several practical needs.
Amer Sports reported Salomon sales rose 35% to more than US$2 billion in calendar 2025. That is the whole brand, including its broader sneaker and outdoor business. It does not tell us what trail generated or what Golden Trail earned.
HOKA: Make The Flagship Event A Product Experience
There is more to the deal than putting a name on the event. HOKA’s 2026 Chamonix programme advertised community runs, athlete sessions and a 6–7K shakeout with trail-shoe testing, including the Tecton X 4. A runner could experience the shoe over a short outing without entering the headline ultra. The published programme does not disclose attendance or conversion.
In February 2026, Nike announced Nike Trail would transition into ACG, bringing trail running, hiking and exploration under one outdoor-performance identity. It also added Broken Arrow Skyrace and Gorge Waterfalls partnerships alongside its Chongli 168 sponsorship.
The product work gives us something else to look at. Nike says the ACG Ultrafly underwent 13 testing rounds and more than 30,000 miles, incorporating feedback across seven countries and 25 US states. Its documented changes include a less rigid, split-spine plate and a roomier forefoot. That makes the runner feedback more tangible. Nike’s performance claims still come from Nike.
Has the bet paid off? We cannot tell yet. Nike’s October 2026 earnings release does not separate ACG or trail revenue. We can see the commitment. Those disclosures cannot establish the size or success of the trail business.
A view, a shoe trial and a redesign are different results. Each can help; none alone proves the investment made money.
Closer To Home: ASICS At BTR
Indonesia already has a useful example of how a brand can build around a race. ASICS published three connected offers around BTR Ultra 2026:
A place to meet. Its Trail Camp page invited all BTR participants to gather and prepare before and after the race. That gives the brand a role in the weekend beyond being a logo on the bib.
Support with a clear exchange. The Fujitrail Team programme offered four selected runners entry, kit, transport and accommodation. Applicants needed OneASICS membership; selected runners were required to join ASICS activities and grant promotional use of their identity and race material. These are published programme terms, not confirmation that all four places were filled.
A reason to return. A separate Thank You BTR offer gave OneASICS members 10% off eligible products from 12 June to 16 July 2026. The dates matter: this was a later purchase invitation, not a discount available at the May race.
Our read: the useful sequence is meet the community → support a few runners → create a next purchase occasion. A smaller shop could test that sequence at a smaller scale. But ASICS does not disclose camp attendance, programme cost, code redemptions or extra sales on these pages. The mechanics are visible; the return on the spending is not.
8. What Consumer Brands Should Build
Twelve shoe buyers can still leave a demo run losing money. The illustrative base case counts returns, purchases that would have happened anyway and the event bill.
The decision: hold recurring spend. A busy morning is a reason to look at the results before booking the next one.
A smaller retailer could test a short, well-supported demo run. Ask trail-curious customers about terrain, budget and size; offer everyday and technical options. They need not shop like future 100K entrants.
Use existing saleable stock and a confirmed loaned or owned test fleet before buying a deeper range.
At the base assumptions, break-even needs 15 first-order buyers, or 37.5% of trialists, without relying on repeats. Alternatively, cost must fall below Rp2.985 million without weakening support.
Can One Demo Run Pay For Itself?
Follow three steps: pay for the run, work out what orders leave behind, then subtract purchases that would have happened anyway. Replace these assumptions with the shop’s own figures.
The Run And The Orders
This is an illustrative decision, not a real activation. Budget Rp3.6 million for staff, route support, refreshments, demo-kit wear, transport and administration, including contingency. These are allowances, not supplier quotes. If proper support costs more, redesign the event or raise the budget.
Start with 60 bookings, 48 attendees and 40 completed trials. Twelve people buy one pair within 14 days: 30% of trialists. Count fulfilled orders, then settle refunds under the shop’s policy. Trying two sizes does not create two prospective customers.
Assume a Rp1.5 million selling price after discounts and remitted taxes, and Rp975,000 landed product cost on the same tax basis. Neither is a disclosed retailer margin.
Order costs are Rp30,000 payment plus Rp20,000 fulfilment per order; each return adds Rp30,000 handling and a 5% write-down of product cost. Payment, fulfilment, return handling and returned-stock write-downs add Rp694,500 across the base-case orders.
What The Orders Leave Behind
Those twelve orders produce Rp18 million of sales before refunds. At a hypothetical 10% return rate, revenue falls to Rp16.2 million. After product and other order costs, contribution is Rp4.976 million.
What The Event Actually Added
What would the shop have earned anyway? If 40% of orders would have happened on the same terms, subtract their Rp1.990 million contribution. That leaves Rp2.985 million of extra contribution against a Rp3.6 million event bill: a Rp615,000 loss.
The organic-purchase deduction assumes identical prices, costs and return behaviour without the event; discounts on otherwise full-price sales require another deduction.
Fractional customers are expected values. Existing-store overhead and income tax are excluded: this is incremental contribution, not company net profit. Published consumer prices are context; model selling prices and costs use a consistent net-of-remitted-tax basis.
One Demo, Three Possible Outcomes
Illustrative input or result
Downside
Base
Upside
Attendees / completed trials
36 / 24
48 / 40
54 / 48
First-order buyers
6
12
20
Return rate
20%
10%
5%
Orders expected without event
60%
40%
20%
Extra contribution after event expense
−Rp2.750m
−Rp0.615m
+Rp3.517m
Assumed repeat rate by day 90
0%
20%
30%
Result including those repeat purchases
−Rp2.750m
−Rp0.518m
+Rp3.859m
All cases share the event cost and unit economics. Every count, cost and rate is hypothetical; these are not Indonesian benchmarks or probability-weighted forecasts.
Repeat applies only to estimated incremental customers who kept their first purchase, at Rp75,000 net contribution per further purchase in days 15–90, after its costs and refunds. It could be socks or supplies; another pair of shoes is not guaranteed.
A one-off learning test needs an explicit loss budget: zero sales loses the full event bill. And buying 24 saleable pairs would tie up another Rp23.4 million before any demo-kit purchase. Unsold stock still needs funding.
Before You Book The Next Run
Before booking again, link each consenting customer’s attendance, trials, purchases and returns without double counting. Separate new and existing customers. A similar group, chosen in advance and not invited, helps test how many purchases would have happened anyway.
A tagged sale does not prove the event created an extra sale. One small event cannot establish dependable retention, either. Ask what failed in the fit, then show what the next session changes.
Give each partner a defined job: completed trials for a shoe supplier, qualifying transactions for a payments partner. Agree the measure before paying for the logo. Views can serve an audience goal; a repeat event needs a business case.
The ultra dream can make a brand interesting. Being useful on an ordinary training day earns another chance. Whether the customer stops at 15K or reaches 100K, the achievement remains theirs.
OUR VIEW
Sell the kit. Earn the trust. Leave the achievement to the runner.
Reference Notes
ASICS Indonesia programme and promotion pages checked on 18 October 2026. Their published terms establish what was offered, not attendance, redemptions, sales or profitability.
The original sources were checked on 16 October 2026; the new Indonesian price checks and illustrative decision model are dated 17 October. Participation, registrations, finishes, index holders, views and revenue are different measures. No overseas rate is used to estimate Indonesia’s market.
BTR registration counts do not establish starts, finishes or repeat participation.
OIA’s public report page supplies the participation figures. Its full report and detailed tables are member-gated; its public executive summary describes the casual/core pattern. We do not infer an unpublished road-growth rate.
UltraRunning’s historical database can be updated as results are added. Growth rates here are calculated from its 2024 and 2025 counts, not a fixed cohort of races.
HYROX figures are attributed to its former owner. Seasonal participant counts are not assumed to be distinct annual customers.
The motivation studies are small, non-representative samples. Identity and status are interpretations, not established causes of Indonesian ultra growth.
Brand financial periods and scopes differ. None of the cited disclosures isolates trail revenue or establishes sponsorship return. HOKA’s next results are scheduled for 22 October 2026.
Photography Credits
Photographs retain their full frames and are resized or compressed for display. They remain available under the linked CC BY-SA 4.0 licences, independently of this article. Use of these photographs does not imply endorsement by their photographers, participants or event organisers.
What assumptions or evidence should I examine before acting on this article?
A human response, usually within 1-2 business days, not an instant AI answer. Questions remain editable until you press Send. You will be asked to sign in if needed.
No approved comments yet. Be the first to add a thoughtful note.
Discussion
Loading discussion...